Here is what reviewers said about works now recognized as classics.
Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte: "... the only consolation which we have in reflecting upon it is that it will never be generally read."
Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll: "We fancy that any real child might be more puzzled than enchanted by this stiff, overwrought story."
'Oblivion lingers' |
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald: "... a book of the season only."
Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert: "Monsieur Flaubert is not a writer."
Moby Dick by Herman Melville: "... an ill-compounded mixture of romance and matter of fact ..."
Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoi: "Sentimental rubbish ... Show me one page that contains an idea."
Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman: "Of course, to call it poetry, in any sense, would be mere abuse of language."
And here are a few comments made by publishers in their rejection letters:
The Good Earth by Pearl Buck: "Regret the American public is not interested in anything on China."
A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle: "Neither long enough for a serial nor short enough for a single story."
Sanctuary by William Faulkner: "Good God, I can't publish this. We'd both be in jail."
The Diary of Anne Frank: "The girl doesn't, it seems to me, have a special perception or feeling which would lift that book above the 'curiosity' level."
"Unpublishable." |
The Last of the Plainsmen by Zane Grey: "I do not see anything in this to convince me you can write either narrative or fiction."
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller: "I haven't the foggiest idea about what the man is trying to say."
The Blessing Way by Tony Hillman: "If you insist on rewriting this, get rid of all that Indian stuff."
A Separate Peace by John Knowles: "I feel rather hopeless about his having a future.:"
The Late George Apley by John P. Marquand: "Unpublishable."
The Time Machine by H.G. Wells: "It is not interesting enough for the general reader and not thorough enough for the scientific reader."
Oh, well. We all make mistakes.
No comments:
Post a Comment