When I read that, I agreed with it, for I have read a number of O'Rourke books and laughed my way through each of them. Yet after finishing this book, I found that I disagreed. So what went wrong?
The main problem, I think, is that O'Rourke's lines are funnier in context than standing alone. There are exceptions, of course:
"There is only one hard-and-fast rule about the place to have a party: someone else's place."
"If you run more than twenty miles a week, try not to die young, It will make people snigger."
"El Salvador has the scenery of northern California and the climate of southern California plus — and this was a relief — no Californians."
"Freedom of speech is important — if you have anything to say. I've checked the Internet; nobody does."
Yet so many of the lines quoted were, I'm sure, much more amusing in the context of the book or article in which they are found. They are like the punch lines without the jokes.
And many of the excerpts collected by Terry McDonell, the editor, are not really funny at all, but just good examples of clever writing, even witty writing, but not knee-slapping stuff. Here is a sample about Tanzania" "Probably every child whose parents weren't rich enough has been told, 'We're rich in other ways.' Tanzania is fabulously rich in other ways." That's a great line, but I wouldn't call it funny.
I enjoyed The Funny Stuff very much, but I think I would have called it The Good Stuff.
No comments:
Post a Comment